Stewart Shackleton

Stewart Shackleton是SR Shackleton LLP的创办人,他在国际法和比较法以及仲裁领域有超过二十年的专业经验。他同时拥有大陆法系和普通法系的执业资格,并具有加拿大出庭大律师(“Barrister”),巴黎律师协会律师(“Avocat”),英格兰和威尔士讼辩律师(“Solicitor-Advocate”) 和香港事务律师 (“Solicitor”)资格。

Shackleton律师以律师或仲裁员身份,参与了450多件在全球所有主要仲裁地进行的仲裁案件,案件所涉及领域广泛,包括外国投资、公共特许和基础设施、能源、石油及天然气、通讯、商品、采矿及勘探、国际货物买卖和分销、代理和许可、医药、生物及化学产品的研发、软件及软件技术转让、商标和特许经营、豪华酒店经营、银行与金融服务、国际贸易和运输、海商法、传媒与娱乐、竞争、体育法、建筑、工程设计、合资企业、股权、并购、保险与再保险等。

作为加拿大的出庭大律师(“Barrister”)和法国的执业律师(“Avocat”),Shackleton律师在众多的国际仲裁庭和英国及法国的法院作为律师出庭。他在国际公法领域尤其突出,曾在众多涉及政府和政府机构的纠纷中担任律师和仲裁员,包括依据解决国际争端投资中心公约仲裁规则、国际商会仲裁规则和联合国国际贸易法委员会仲裁规则进行的仲裁。

Shackleton律师也为国际纠纷相关法院诉讼提供法律服务,在管辖权,判决执行,冲突法以及国际司法合作领域具有丰富的经验。

他出版了许多国际仲裁专著,还是Sweet & Maxwell《国际仲裁法评论》编辑委员会成员以及牛津大学出版社出版的《年度仲裁法律报告和评论》(www.alrr.oxfordjournals.org)的编辑。

教育背景

  • 伦敦大学国王学院建筑法硕士
  • 巴黎第一大学国际公法深入研究文凭
  • 巴黎第二大学国际私法大学高级文凭
  • 巴黎第一大学非洲法深入研究文凭
  • 巴黎第二大学比较法大学文凭
  • 巴黎第二大学民法商法方向学士
  • 加拿大西安大略大学法学学士
  • 加拿大西安大略大学法国文学学士(优秀)法国贝桑松大学(弗朗什一孔泰大学)语言学士

专业领域

Shackleton律师在国际法和国际仲裁领域有广泛的经验,曾经担任出庭律师或仲裁员参与在包括香港、上海、北京、纽约、洛杉矶、迈阿密、日内瓦、苏黎士、布达佩斯、斯德哥尔摩、伦敦、巴黎、米兰、罗马、开罗、吉达、迪拜、巴林和多哈等主要仲裁地进行的国际商事和建筑仲裁案件。他尤其擅长处理涉及国际公法因素的纠纷,曾在涉及政府、政府机构和国际公法组织的国际公法争议中担任出庭律师和仲裁员,包括在解决国际争端投资中心公约下的投资保护仲裁。

Shackleton律师曾经为包括由伦敦国际仲裁院组织的INDENTRUS国际银团贷款和雅典环线建设等项目设计和起草了复杂的争议解决条款。他曾经在英国有效争议解决中心(CEDR)组织的国际调解程序中担任调解员,是经该中心认可的调解员。

Shackleton律师的执业经验还包括对撤销仲裁裁决提供意见以及在当地法院作为首席律师和讼辩律师出庭。

他曾担任由一方委托的仲裁员,独任仲裁员和首席仲裁员审理包括因建筑、电信、酒店项目、融资、商品和货物交易买卖等纠纷(尤其是一方是政府或政府机构的情形)所进行的国际商会仲裁、伦敦国际仲裁院仲裁和临时仲裁。

仲裁委员会成员

Shackleton律师是下述仲裁委员会的成员:
中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员(国际仲裁员)、日内瓦商会、瑞士仲裁员协会、国际商会(加拿大委员会)、伦敦国际仲裁院、印度仲裁委员会、海湾地区商事仲裁中心巴林、英属哥伦比亚国际商事仲裁中心(国际仲裁员)、美国仲裁协会(国际仲裁员)、英国仲裁协会成员

主要司法判例

Shackleton律师在英国法院作为首席出庭律师及讼辩律师参与了众多与仲裁协议或仲裁裁决相关的诉讼,包括下述主要司法判例:

  • Metal Distributors (UK) Ltd v ZCCM [2005] ArbLR 42; [2005] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 37 (QB)
  • Lithuania v Svenska Petroleum Exploration AB [2006] ArbLR 57; [2006] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 181 (QB)
  • Lithuania v Svenska Petroleum Exploration AB [2011] ArbLR 59; [2007] 2 WLR 876 (Court of Appeal)
  • Double K Oil Products 1996 Ltd v Neste Oil OYJ [2010] 1 Lloyds Law Rep 141 (QB)
  • Midgulf International Ltd v Groupe Chimique Tunisien [2010] Lloyds Law Rep 543 (Court of Appeal)
  • Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-És Gázkutató KFT, Comm Ct, Gloster J [2011] 1 Lloyds Law Rep 252 (QB)
  • Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-És Gázkutató KFT, Comm Ct, Hamblen J [2011] ArbLR 1; 1 Lloyds Law Rep 510 (QB)
  • Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-És Gázkutató KFT, Comm Ct, HH Judge Mackie QC [2011] ArbLR 17
  • Claxton Engineering Services Ltd v TXM Olaj-És Gázkutató KFT, Court of Appeal, Lord Justice Rix [2011] ArbLR 16

主要发表文章

  • (1994) “La pensée juridique de Michel Villey dans le monde anglophone,” in Niort, J-F and Vannier, G (eds) Michel Villey et le droit naturel en question, Paris, L’Harmattan, p 105
  • (1996) “Under the Dragon: The Future for International Arbitration in Hong Kong,” The In-House Lawyer, no 45 (November) p 46
  • (1996) “The 1996 English Arbitration Act: what improvements for international dispute resolution?” The Parliamentary Policy Forum, p 58
  • (1997) with Peter Hall, “Margaret Rutherford and John Sims – Arbitration Act 1996: A Practical Guide,” Oil & Gas Law And Taxation Review, vol 15, no 4, p 144
  • (1997) “India Builds for a Bright Future: The Modernisation of International Arbitration in India,” The In-House Lawyer, no 48 (March) p 39
  • (1997) “Paris Conference on the New English Arbitration Act,” Practical Arbitration Journal (May/June) vol 1, no 1 p 15
  • (1997) “Solving Disputes the Arbitration Way,” The Lawyer, 3 June 1997
  • (1997) “When is an Arbitration Clause Unenforceable in an International Transaction?” The In-House Lawyer, no 50 (May) p 84
  • (1997) “An Overview of the Key Changes to the ICC Rules for International Arbitration,” Practical Arbitration Journal, vol 1, no 3, p 32
  • (1997) “The Applicable Law in International Arbitration under the New English Arbitration Act 1996,” Arbitration International, vol 13, no 4, p 375
  • (1997) “Challenging an Award under the Arbitration Act 1996: What has changed?” The In-House Lawyer, no 41 (June) p 76
  • (1997) “Preliminary Meetings with the Arbitral Tribunal: What are they for?” Practical Arbitration Journal, no 1, vol 4, p. 43
  • (1997) “Arbitration in Hong Kong after the Hand Over,” Practical Arbitration Journal, no 1, vol 4, p 37
  • (1997) “Questions and Answers Concerning the New 1998 ICC Rules for International Arbitration,” Practical Arbitration Journal, no 1, vol 5, p 58
  • (1997) “Key Changes to the ICC Rules for International Arbitration,” Practical Arbitration Journal Rules,” Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, vol 13, no 7, p 37
  • (1998) “The New English Arbitration Act 1996,” Tijdschrift voor Arbitrage, vol 3, p 81
  • (1998) with Joachim Kuckenburg, “The German Institution of Arbitration Issues New Arbitration Rules,” Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, vol 13, no 7, p 37
  • (1999) “Collection of Procedural Decisions in ICC Arbitration – Recueil des décisions de procédure dans l’arbitrage CCI (1993-1996) by Dominique Hascher,” International Arbitration Law Review, vol 2, no 1
  • (1999) “Global Warming: Milder Still in England – Part I,” International Arbitration Law Review, vol 2, no 2, p 53
  • (1999) “Global Warming: Milder Still in England – Part II,” International Arbitration Law Review, vol 2, no 4, p 117
  • (2000) “Global Warming: Milder Still in England – Part III,” International Arbitration Law Review, vol 3, no 3, p 59
  • (2000) “The Internationalisation of English Arbitration Law,” ICC International Court of Arbitration Bulletin, vol 11, no 1, p 16
  • (2000) “A Single New Arbitration Regime for 15 African States – Beyond the Model Law?” LCIA Newsletter vol 5, no 4, p 2
  • (2001) “English Judicial Decisions on Arbitration – 2000,” International Arbitration Law Review, vol 4, no 6, p 178
  • (2002) “English Judicial Decisions on Arbitration – 2001,” International Arbitration Law Review, vol 5, no 6, p 206
  • (2002) “Challenging Arbitration Awards,” New Law Journal (November (1746) and December (1834))(2002) “Arbitration without a Contract,” Mealey’s International Arbitration Report, September, vol 17, no 9
  • (2002) “Investment Protection Arbitration,” Insurance Day (November)
  • (2003) “Footing the Bill – Compensation Claims Against Argentina under ICSID,” Legal Week Global (January) p 16
  • (2003) “English Judicial Decisions on Arbitration – 2002,” International Arbitration Law Review, vol 6, no 6, p 220
  • (2001 to present) Editor, Arbitration Law Review and Reports, Oxford University Press
  • (2005) Series of articles for Legal Week Global on “Key Concepts in Investment Protection Arbitration”
  • (2010) “The High Cost of London as an Arbitration Venue – the Court of Appeal Rejects Compétence-Compétence and Separability in Midgulf v Groupe Chimique TunisienInternational Arbitration Law Review, vol 2, p 50